Gay sex connect
This site is not intended to be viewed by minors. If minors have access to your computer, please use one of the following programs to prevent them from accessing the site: Gay Sex Chat Member Login. Welcome to Men4SexNow. Free access! Create your free profile in minutes. No strings attached! Featured guys on Men4Sexnow. Sex Now View sex now listings in your area.
Less chat. More sex. Mobile Find guys near you. Works with all devices. Get laid on the go! Sex Match Meet your match tonight. Who did this linking, how does it work, and what harm is it doing?
Get In On The Action And Hook Up!
For those who don't know, Grindr describes itself as a "simple, fast, fun, and free way to find and meet gay, bi and curious guys for dating, socializing, and friendship. You start up the app and immediately see how close other users are and some information about them. Grindr isn't unique or new in this respect. Such sites, applications, and the practices they make possible are becoming almost downright mainstream: To answer the first question of who made this association between Grindr and Sex Offender Search: To be fair, Apple has had its own struggles deciding what kinds of apps to sell: The problem of deciding what to sell through the app store is not new.
But we're far from fully understanding the ethical obligations that Apple, Google and others have when their platforms act as de facto regulators of free speech. The second question -- how was this association made -- is harder to answer. Google, Microsoft, Apple and Facebook don't make public the systems and algorithms they use to create relationships among data.
Is the Android Marketplace noticing a large overlap between those who download Grindr and those who install Sex Offender Search? This seems unlikely given their two very different target audiences. Was this an editorial decision made by a human curator of the Marketplace who thought the two applications were somehow related? This curious choice would say more about the curator than the applications. Does some part of the system consider the applications' Marketplace categories -- "Social" for Grindr and "Lifestyle" for Sex Offenders Search -- so similar that it thinks users would be interested seeing connections between the categories?
This is plausible but there are many other applications in both categories that might be linked -- why these two? Finally, are terms the application creators themselves use to describe their programs considered similar through some automatic keyword matching algorithm?
- What constitutes the best sex life for gay and bisexual men? Implications for HIV prevention?
- iHeartGuys: Live Gay Cams - Sex Chat Rooms - (No Signup Required).
- gay sex dating roanoke va.
- best gay international dating sites.
- gay kink dating website.
- when did you start dating gay.
Sex Offender Search lists these key words: The description of Grindr lists no keywords but says that it "only allows males 18 years or older" to download the application and that "[p]hotos depicting nudity or sex acts are strictly prohibited. It's hard to see the overlap among these three applications yet, for some reason, the Marketplace thinks the most relevant application to Grinder is Sex Offender Search.
Find Your Gay Hookup Tonight | hotzone.asia
The last question -- what harm are such associations doing -- is more complicated to answer. Associations like those listed in the Android Marketplace or Apple's Genius system, Amazon's recommendation engine or Bing's search suggestions can be starting points for good conversation or chilling silencers of individual expression and community identity. To be starting points for conversation, designers must first acknowledge that recommendation systems both those that are run by humans and those relying upon algorithms have the power to suggest and constrain expression.
- Account Options;
- About our community;
- Background;
Bizarre links between Grindr and Sex Offender Search can be great starting points for those who are privileged enough to recognize nonsensical associations, possess enough technical knowledge to understand how such systems might make links, and have the confidence and communication skills to argue the point with friends, family members and others.
These can be great opportunities to debunk bad thinking that would otherwise go unchallenged. But if we think that technologies are somehow neutral and objective arbiters of good thinking -- rational systems that simply describe the world without making value judgments -- we run into real trouble.
The Curious Connection Between Apps for Gay Men and Sex Offenders
For example, if recommendation systems suggest that certain associations are more reasonable, rational, common or acceptable than others we run the risk of silencing minorities. This is the well-documented " Spiral of Silence " effect political scientists routinely observe that essentially says you are less likely to express yourself if you think your opinions are in the minority, or likely to be in the minority in the near future.
Imagine for a moment a gay man questioning his sexual orientation. He has told no one else that he's attracted to guys and hasn't entirely come out to himself yet.